Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371186›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Probability Score for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Development and Validation of a Practical Multi-analyte Machine Learning Model.

Jim Parr, Van Thai-Paquette, Pearl Paranjape, Alex McLaren, Carl Deirmengian, Krista Toler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jim ParrData Science and Machine Learning, Zimmer Biomet, Swindon, GBR.
Van Thai-PaquetteDiagnostics Research and Development, Zimmer Biomet, Claymont, USA.
Pearl ParanjapeDiagnostics Research and Development, Zimmer Biomet, Claymont, USA.
Alex McLarenOrthopedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, USA.
Carl DeirmengianOrthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, USA.
Krista TolerDiagnostics Research and Development, Zimmer Biomet, Claymont, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) relies on established criteria-based systems requiring interpretation and combination of multiple laboratory tests into scoring systems. In routine clinical care, clinicians implement these algorithms to diagnose PJI. Existing literature indicates suboptimal adoption and implementation of these criteria in clinical practice, even among experts. Recognizing the need for accurate PJI diagnosis through proper synthesis of multiple laboratory parameters, this study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model that generates a preoperative PJI probability score based solely on synovial fluid (SF) biomarkers within 24 hours. Materials and methods A two-stage ML model was constructed using 104,090 SF samples from 2,923 institutions (2018-2024). First, unsupervised learning identified natural clusters in the data to label samples as "infected" or "not infected." Then, these labels trained a supervised logistic regression model that generated PJI scores (0-100), categorizing cases as PJI positive (> 80), PJI negative (< 20), or equivocal (20-80). The model incorporated 10 SF biomarkers: specimen integrity markers (absorbance at 280 nm, red blood cell count), inflammatory markers (white blood cell count, percentage of neutrophils, SF C-reactive protein), a PJI-specific biomarker (alpha-defensin), and microbial antigen markers (

Indexed as

algorithmic analysisalpha-defensinsartificial intelligence (ai)infection probabilitymachine learningmultianalyte assayperiprosthetic joint infectionpji diagnosissynovial fluid analysistotal joint arthroplasty (tja)

Identifiers

PMID40371186
PMCPMC12074866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.