Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371083›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Sensory driven neurophysiological mechanisms of concussion: a parsimonious and falsifiable theory.

Donald Krieger, Paul Shepard, Anthony Kontos, Michael W Collins, Ava Puccio, Shawn R Eagle, Walter Schneider, David O Okonkwo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Donald KriegerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Paul ShepardDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Anthony KontosDepartment of Sports Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Michael W CollinsDepartment of Sports Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Ava PuccioDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Shawn R EagleDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Walter SchneiderDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
David O OkonkwoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every time a person sustains a blow to the head, they receive multiple atypical sensory inputs, often including pain. These directly stimulate the central nervous system. Yet, sensory input as a causal agent of neurophysiological dysfunction and post-concussion symptoms has never been explored. A new theory is proposed of sensory driven neurophysiological mechanisms of concussion (i) which are causally linked to the momentary blow to the head, (ii) whose time courses and other properties correspond to those observed to date for acute, sub-acute, and chronic symptoms, and (iii) which give rise to testable questions with experimentally measurable consequences. The primary assertion of the theory is that trauma induced excitation of key brain regions including the salience network (SN) and locus coeruleus (LC) can produce persistent dysfunctional alterations in the stable patterns of network excitability on which symptom-free neurological function depends. This mechanism is in play with any physical trauma, with or without a blow to the head. That is because atypical, painful, and otherwise high intensity sensory stimuli excite the SN and thence the LC, inducing plasticity widely in the brain. Many of those sensory stimuli may persist through the recovery period and while the brain is plastic, enable one or another network to learn altered and potentially dysfunctional patterns of network excitability. The secondary assertion of the theory is that with a blow to the head, convergence of high-intensity sensory stimuli within the brainstem and midbrain can cause neurophysiological coupling between brainstem nuclei which normally function independently, i.e. brainstem crosstalk (BCT). It is BCT which causes the signs and symptoms specific to head trauma, e.g., loss of consciousness, and oculomotor and vestibular dysfunction. The theory's reliance on sensory input emphasizes the importance of putative mechanisms whose initiating cause is known to have been present for every head trauma. This is in contrast to the century-long focus on mechanisms whose initiating cause, brain injury, is undetectable by clinical exam, neuroimaging, and bioassay in fully 60% of all head trauma, i.e., 70-75% of all mild TBI. As formulated and described, the theory is readily testable and falsifiable.

Indexed as

CamCANconcussionhead traumamagnetoencephalagraphyneurophysiologytraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID40371083
PMCPMC12074929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.