ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Prediction of prognosis in acute ischemic stroke after mechanical thrombectomy based on multimodal MRI radiomics and deep learning.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Multiparametric MRI-based habitat analysis integrating deep learning and radiomics for predicting preoperative Ki-67 expression level in breast cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Multimodal machine learning for predicting postoperative functional outcomes in surgically treated supratentorial deep intracerebral hemorrhage: a prospective multicenter study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Multimodal data fusion of dual-modal DWI-ADC MRI and clinical variables for prognostic prediction in acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a major global health threat associated with high rates of disability and mortality, highlighting the need for early prognostic assessment to guide treatment. Currently, there are no reliable methods for the early prediction of poor prognosis in AIS, especially after mechanical thrombectomy. This study aimed to explore the value of radiomics and deep learning based on multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting poor prognosis in patients with AIS who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. This study aimed to provide a more accurate and comprehensive tool for stroke prognosis. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and multimodal MRI images of patients with stroke at admission. Logistic regression was employed to identify the risk factors associated with poor prognosis and to construct a clinical model. Radiomics features of the stroke-affected regions were extracted from the patients' baseline multimodal MRI images, and the optimal radiomics features were selected using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model combined with five-fold cross-validation. The radiomics score was calculated based on the feature weights, and machine learning techniques were applied using a logistic regression classifier to develop the radiomics model. In addition, a deep learning model was devised using ResNet101 and transfer learning. The clinical, radiomics, and deep learning models were integrated to establish a comprehensive multifactorial logistic regression model, termed the CRD (Clinic-Radiomics-Deep Learning) model. The performance of each model in predicting poor prognosis was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, with the optimal model visualized as a nomogram. A calibration curve was plotted to evaluate the accuracy of nomogram predictions. Results: A total of 222 patients with AIS were enrolled in this study in a 7:3 ratio, with 155 patients in the training cohort and 67 in the validation cohort. Statistical analysis of clinical data from the training and validation cohorts identified two independent risk factors for poor prognosis: the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission and the occurrence of intracerebral hemorrhage. Of the 1,197 radiomic features, 16 were selected to develop the radiomics model. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis of specific indicators demonstrated varying performances across methods and cohorts. In the training cohort, the clinical, radiomics, deep learning, and integrated CRD models achieved AUC values of 0.762, 0.755, 0.689, and 0.834, respectively. In the validation cohort, the clinical model exhibited an AUC of 0.874, the radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.805, the deep learning model attained an AUC of 0.757, and the CRD model outperformed all models, with an AUC of 0.908. Calibration curves indicated that the CRD model showed exceptional consistency and accuracy in predicting poor prognosis in patients with AIS. Decision curve analysis revealed that the CRD model offered the highest net benefit compared with the clinical, radiomics, and deep learning models. Conclusion: The CRD model based on multimodal MRI demonstrated high diagnostic efficacy and reliability in predicting poor prognosis in patients with AIS who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. This model holds considerable potential for assisting clinicians with risk assessment and decision-making for patients experiencing ischemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.