ArticleIndian journal of microbiology2025
Next-Gen Nano Biosensor Technologies to Monitor Carbapenem Resistance for Personalized Medicine.
Article in Indian journal of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gold nanocluster-based biosensing for rapid detection of carbapenem-resistant organisms in bloodstream infections.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- The gut virome and human health: From diversity to personalized medicine.Engineering microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbapenem resistance represents a pressing public health concern, posing significant challenges due to limited treatment options and escalating mortality rates. In India, the prevalence of carbapenem resistance among Enterobacteriaceae ranges between 18 to 31%, causing severe infections such as bloodstream infections, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and intra-abdominal infections. Accurate and timely diagnosis, particularly for Enterobacteriaceae producing carbapenemase, is crucial for effective clinical prophylaxis of critical care patients as they are considered as a last resort of therapy. Various genotypic and non-genotypic detection methods have been developed over the past decade, their limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity have led the exploration of innovative technologies. Advanced opportunities for carbapenem resistance detection using microfluidic-based biosensors have miniaturized various biomedical devices. This enables the use of less sample and reagents, cheap pricing, automation, screening, and improved detection. Despite ongoing research and development, the adoption of these biosensors in healthcare settings is limited due to the lack of awareness and understanding of their efficiency. Therefore, this review primarily focuses on the advantages and limitations of all biosensor-based devices over existing methods for the detection of carbapenem resistance in gram negative bacilli. These biosensors represent substantial advancements in combating carbapenem resistance, providing promise for more reliable and accurate diagnostic techniques that may eventually improve patient care and infection control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.