ArticleOTO open
Office-Based Blue Laser Versus Coblation Therapy for Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy: A Pilot Study.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Blue laser turbinate reduction with vs. without posterior nasal neurolysis for refractory rhinitis: a retrospective comparative study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this pilot study is to compare the effectiveness of office-based blue laser therapy with coblation therapy in patients with inferior turbinate hypertrophy (ITH). Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Methods: Patients presenting with nasal obstruction between November 2022 and November 2024, and underwent coblation or blue laser therapy for turbinate reduction were reviewed. Demographic data included age, gender, smoking, history of allergy, history of reflux disease, and history of prior nasal surgery. All patients had filled the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire and the visual analog scale (VAS) before and on follow-up after treatment. Patient's level of comfort during the procedure was also rated using a 10-point Likert scale with a higher score indicating a greater level of comfort. Results: A total of 10 patients underwent office-based blue laser therapy for turbinate reduction, and 10 patients underwent office-based coblation of the inferior turbinates. In the subgroup of patients who underwent office-based blue laser therapy, the mean NOSE score and VAS score decreased significantly ( Conclusion: The results of this investigation indicate that both coblation therapy and blue laser therapy are effective office-based treatment modalities in patients with ITH with comparable results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.