Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40370984›Full record

ReviewACS pharmacology & translational science2025

The 3C (Cell Culture, Computer Simulation, Clinical Trial) Solution for Optimizing the 3R (Replace, Reduction, Refine) Framework during Preclinical Research Involving Laboratory Animals.

Susmita Roy, Mehnaz Parveen, Asis Bala, Debjeet Sur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susmita RoyHaldia Institute of Pharmacy, ICARE Complex, Haldia Purba Medinipur 721657, India.
Mehnaz ParveenDivision of Pharmacology, Guru Nanak Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, 157/F Nilgunj Road, Panihati, Kolkata 700114, India.
Asis BalaPharmacology and Drug Discovery Research Laboratory, Division of Life Sciences, Institute of Advanced Study in Science and Technology, an Autonomous Institute under the Department of Science and Technology (Govt. of India), Vigyan Path, Guwahati, Assam 781035, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2148-2331
Debjeet SurDivision of Pharmacology, Guru Nanak Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, 157/F Nilgunj Road, Panihati, Kolkata 700114, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5525-5156

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical research has traditionally utilized laboratory animals to elucidate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of new chemical entities prior to human trials. The use of animal models has been pivotal in advancing scientific knowledge and medical breakthroughs, contributing significantly to our understanding of the complex biological processes and human diseases. However, many promising treatments that have demonstrated efficacy in animal studies have failed to translate to human subjects during clinical trials. Consequently, animal testing faces ethical concerns and criticism regarding its predictive reliability for human responses. This has led to the development of 3R principles (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement), introduced in 1959, advocating for alternative methods and improved animal welfare in research. Furthermore, regulatory frameworks and recent legislation, such as the 2022 FDA Modernisation Act, emphasize modern scientific alternatives to traditional animal testing. Emerging approaches, known as the 3Cs-cell culture, computer simulation, and phase 0 clinical trials-offer promising nonanimal solutions that could accelerate drug development and address ethical concerns, potentially rendering preclinical research more humane and efficient.

Identifiers

PMID40370984
PMCPMC12070318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.