ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Transdermal and Powdered Scopolamine-Induced Anisocoria: A Report of Two Cases.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute Anticholinergic Toxic Syndrome Due to Scopolamine Exposure: A Case Report with Possible Drug-Facilitated Administration.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Article
- Abnormal pupils at the bedside: rapid recognition of neurologic and systemic emergencies in acute care settings.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Asymmetric mydriasis caused by facial antiperspirant misuse: a case report.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In this case report, we present 2 cases of sudden-onset anisocoria caused by accidental exposure to scopolamine in 2 young female patients. Case Presentation: Two patients presented with unilateral anisocoria. One patient experienced unilateral mydriasis accompanied by neurological symptoms from a transdermal scopolamine patch, while the other, exposed to powdered scopolamine, presented with unilateral mydriasis without additional neurological symptoms. Both cases showed gradual resolution of symptoms over several days without intervention. Initially, Adie's pupil (tonic pupil) was high in the differential diagnosis, but a comprehensive history taking revealed scopolamine exposure as the more likely cause. In the first case, pilocarpine did not result in miosis, while in the second case, pilocarpine initially induced miosis but was followed by a return to mydriasis. Although current literature suggests that mydriasis caused by an anticholinergic substance presents as pupil dilation unresponsive to pilocarpine, our case series shows its inconsistency in clinical presentation. Conclusion: This report presents 1 case of systemic scopolamine toxicity, alongside unilateral mydriasis, adding confusion to the case given the expected bilateral mydriasis in systemic toxicity, and another case of pharmacological anisocoria secondary to exposure to scopolamine with an atypical reaction to pilocarpine. These cases highlight the importance of thorough history taking and the need to consider pharmacological causes in the differential diagnosis of acute anisocoria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.