ArticleCureus2025
Impact of Proximity and Accessibility of Urgent Care Centers on Emergency Department Utilization for Non-emergent Visits.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Social determinants of health, including transportation, impact access to healthcare and health outcomes. Urgent Cares (UCs) play an important role in caring for minor injuries and ailments but are asymmetrically distributed and often located in or near more affluent communities. Accessibility of UCs by public and private transit varies widely. While UCs can address acute healthcare needs that do not require emergent treatment, location and transit times may influence their utility. This study aims to characterize the relationship between transit times to different healthcare facilities and ED utilization for non-emergent visits. Methods Publicly available ED utilization data was obtained for Milwaukee County from 2019-2020. ED visits by ZIP code were categorized as either emergent or non-emergent as defined by the validated New York University - Emergency Department Visit Algorithm (NYU-EDA) classification system. A Google Maps application programming interface was used to compute the public and private transit times between the population center of each census tract and its nearest UC and ED. Associations between transit times and the percent of non-emergent ED utilization were measured. Results Median transit times were shorter to EDs than UCs across the county. Decreased transit times to EDs were associated with increased ED utilization for non-emergent complaints across both private and public transportation methods (p=0.23 and p=0.02, respectively). Increased transit time to UCs was associated with increased ED utilization for non-emergent complaints across private and public transportation (p=0.07 and p=0.34). Conclusions Decreased transit times to EDs and increased transit times to UCs are associated with increased ED utilization for non-emergent complaints. This suggests accessibility and geographic proximity may play a role in patient choices regarding where to seek care and carries public health and healthcare policy implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.