ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2025
A snapshot on molecular technologies for diagnosing FAdV infections.
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical value of blood circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA) in liquid biopsy of lung cancer: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- First report and molecular characterization of gizzard erosion-associated fowl adenovirus serotype 8a in Thailand.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Article
- Fowl adenovirus infections: A comprehensive review of prevalence, pathogenesis, diagnosis, control, and economic impact.Poultry science · 2026Review
- Computational Identification of Natural Inhibitors Targeting Fiber Proteins of FAdV-1 and FAdV-4 Through Integrated Virtual Screening and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Molecular Detection of Balantioides coli in Pigs Employing the Traditional PCR and a Novel Cross-Priming Amplification-Based Lateral Flow Assay.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Serum as an alternative matrix for reliable molecular diagnosis of fowl adenovirus infections.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- The Detection and Differentiation of Pigeon Adenovirus Types 1 and 2 via a High-Resolution Melting Curve Platform.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fowl adenoviruses (FAdV) are prevalent in chickens worldwide, responsible for several poultry diseases, including inclusion body hepatitis (IBH), hepatitis-hydropericardium syndrome (HHS), and gizzard erosion (GE), which result in significant economic losses in the poultry industry. Consequently, detection and efficient identification of FAdV serotypes are becoming extremely urgent to monitor outbreaks and develop vaccination strategies. Conventional PCR (cPCR) tests, combined with Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) or sequencing, were developed for FAdV diagnosis. Although these molecular tests have considerably improved the accuracy of FAdV diagnosis compared with conventional methods, certain drawbacks remain unresolved, including lack of sensitivity and post-PCR analysis. Subsequently, advanced molecular technologies such as real-time PCR (qPCR), Loop Isothermal Amplification (LAMP), Cross-Priming Amplification (CPA), Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA), Digital Droplet Polymerase Chain Reaction (ddPCR), Dot Blot Assay Combined with cPCR, Nanoparticle-Assisted PCR (nano-PCR), PCR-Refractory Quantitative Amplification (ARMS-qPCR), CRISPR/Cas13a Technology, and High-Resolution Melting Curve (HRM), have been developed to improve FAdV diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.