ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Patient Experiences of Treatment Deferral for Evaluation and Monitoring after a Trace Xpert Ultra Result.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: A "trace" result from the Xpert Ultra molecular TB test indicates Methods: We enrolled Ugandan adults and adolescents with trace Xpert Ultra sputum results, plus positive and negative controls, from community-screening and clinic settings. After a comprehensive TB evaluation, participants not recommended to start treatment immediately were closely monitored with interval reassessments. Surveys captured participants' perceptions and preferences related to their uncertain TB status at baseline and during follow-up. Results: A total of 321 people with trace sputum (PWTS), 236 positive controls, and 279 negative controls were enrolled. A minority of PWTS thought they were highly likely to have or develop TB, and most reported low associated anxiety initially (258/321, 80%) and during follow-up. While about half (172/321, 54%) would have favored treatment at baseline if not in the study, those who remained untreated were less inclined toward treatment at six months. Participants generally preferred sensitive diagnostic tests, even with frequent false positives. Conclusions: Deferring treatment for PWTS, with sufficient testing and monitoring, is acceptable to most patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.