ArticleClinical case reports2025
Aesthetic Orthodontic Management of an Iatrogenic Malocclusion Induced by Lingual Appliance Using In-House Clear Aligners.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lingual treatment is becoming more and more common, but it is a field in which not all orthodontists excel. Moreover, patients wearing lingual appliances experience more pain, speech difficulties, and problems maintaining adequate oral hygiene, which may cause them to lose their patience with the technique. As a result, iatrogenic treatment outcomes are sometimes observed. In this case report, the patient's initial chief complaint was spacing. She had been wearing lingual brackets for 1.5 years with minimal improvement. The previous doctor had informed her that the total treatment time would be about 1-1.5 years. However, the patient lost her patience with the treatment and came to us seeking an alternative solution that maintains a similar focus on aesthetics. After discussing potential alternative treatments with the patient, we decided to proceed with in-house aligners. Initially, the patient opted to distribute the spaces for veneers on the anterior teeth to save time. However, after the first series of aligners, she changed her mind and decided to close all the spaces because she found the aligners effective. After 7 months with three series of aligners, the achieved outcomes included closing all spaces, improving the midlines, achieving a Class I canine relationship, and better intercuspation. The treatment outcomes remained stable at the 1-year follow-up. Using in-house aligners is an effective alternative to lingual brackets in certain cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.