ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Ultrasonographic findings in mid-trimester adolescent pregnancy: prevalence and risk of abnormalities.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fetal karyotyping in adolescent pregnancies: a population-based cohort study on outcomes of invasive prenatal testing.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adolescent pregnancy, defined as pregnancy in females aged 19 or younger, is associated with higher risks for adverse outcomes compared to older women. Ultrasound imaging during the mid-trimester is crucial for prenatal care, providing insights into fetal development and maternal health. Objective: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate and compare mid-trimester ultrasound findings between adolescent and older pregnant women and to assess the prevalence and risk of any abnormalities detected during ultrasound examinations. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in the Silesian Voivodeship, Poland, from January 1, 2004, to February 29, 2024. Data were collected from reference prenatal centers. The study included 37,366 individuals, of which 1,152 were adolescents. Participants underwent second-trimester prenatal screening, and ultrasound findings were categorized into fetal abnormalities and maternal factors. Results: The study found significant differences in ultrasonographic findings across different age groups. Adolescent pregnancies showed a higher prevalence of fetal abnormalities, 437.075 per 1,000 pregnancies (95% CI: 409-465). Brain, spine, facial, heart, and urinary tract abnormalities were notably higher in group adolescents. Conclusion: Adolescent pregnancies are associated with increased detection of various fetal abnormalities during mid-trimester ultrasound scans. Contrary to common belief, the young age of adolescent pregnant individuals does not protect against fetal abnormalities. These findings underscore the necessity for comprehensive, population-based ultrasound screening for pregnant adolescents and the classification and management of adolescent pregnancies as high-risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.