ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Detection of circulating tumor cells that predicts the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to assess the predictive potential of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor stem cells (CTSCs) in locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) compared to the RECIST 1.1 standard. Methods: We analyzed 112 patients with TNBC at the Liaoning Tumor Hospital. CTCs and CTSCs were evaluated before NAC, on the first NAC cycle day, and after NAC. We assessed the ability of positive CTSCs after the first cycle to predict NAC resistance (requiring regimen change) with a 91% specificity. Additionally, we analyzed CTC dynamics during the first NAC cycle to predict efficacy (often reaching MP4 or MP5) with 87% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Results: Positive CTSCs post-first cycle predicted NAC resistance with high specificity (91%). The gradual decline in CTCs during the first NAC cycle indicated NAC efficacy, allowing the regimen to continue with a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 80%. Conclusion: This study suggests that positive CTSCs after the first NAC cycle predict resistance, thereby facilitating early detection (≥ 6 weeks earlier than RECIST). Gradual CTC reduction during the first cycle predicts efficacy, enabling regimen continuation. CTCs and CTSCs show promise as predictive markers for NAC efficacy in patients with locally advanced TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.