ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Application of biomarkers in the diagnosis of kidney disease.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarkers in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Early Detection, Prognostic Assessment, and Integration with Multi-Omics Signatures.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mechanisms Linking Recurrent Bacterial Urinary Tract Infections to Chronic Kidney Disease Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Biosensor-Based Detection of Calprotectin and Lactoferrin as Neutrophil-Derived Markers of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: From Molecular Pathophysiology to Point-of-Care Platforms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clinical value of combined serum galectin-9 and urine MCP-1 testing for assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity and early diagnosis of lupus nephritis.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Review
- Association between a diabetes-predictive index and diabetes-related kidney disease in U.S. adults: A cross-sectional study.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Framework for Kidney Function Assessment: Summary of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Reimagining Kidney Function Assessment Workshop.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Worldwide, kidney disease has grown to be an important global public health agenda that reduces longevity. Medical institutions around the globe should enhance screening efforts for kidney disease, to facilitate early kidney disease detection, diagnosis, and intervention. Common screening methods for nephropathy encompass renal tissue biopsy, urine dry chemistry tests, urine formed element analysis, and urine-specific protein assays, among others. These methodologies evaluate renal health by scrutinizing a spectrum of biomarkers. Precise classification and quantitative analysis of these biomarkers can assist in determining the site and extent of kidney injury, as well as in assessing treatment efficacy and prognosis. In this paper, we reviewed the methods and biomarkers for kidney disease and also the integration of multiple biomarkers. With the aim of reasonable applying these markers to the early detection, accurate diagnosis, and scientific management of kidney disease, thereby mitigating the threat posed by kidney disease to human health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.