ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Treatments for different types of ERCP-related Stapfer IV injury: a case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly used, some rare ERCP-related perforation cases have garnered attention. This study aims to report a rare case of Stapfer IV injury accompanied by severe infections and review the appropriate treatment methods for patients with different types of Stapfer IV injury. Case summary: A female patient received ERCP treatments, but she soon presented with massive diffuse abdominal and thoracic gas accompanied by severe infections. In the following upper gastrointestinal radiography examination, no signs of gastrointestinal perforations were observed. After receiving antibiotic treatments and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage therapy, the patient recovered and was discharged. Finally, she was diagnosed with Stapfer IV injury and cholecystitis. Conclusion: Simple Stapfer IV injury was not a true perforation, and the conservative treatment was feasible. When a severe infection occurs in a patient with Stapfer IV injury, the other complications of ERCP procedures, such as cholecystitis, should be taken into consideration. Interventions for the source of infections, not just for the Stapfer IV injury, might be effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.