ArticleOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2025
Delayed Diagnosis and Outcomes in Acute Aortic Dissection: A 10-Year Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute aortic dissection is a rare and life-threatening condition with highly variable clinical presentations, often resulting in atypical symptoms and initial misdiagnosis. This study aimed to investigate clinical presentations and explore the associations between clinical characteristics, delayed diagnosis, and in-hospital mortality among patients with acute aortic dissection. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients presenting with acute aortic dissection at an urban academic emergency department in Thailand between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020. Baseline characteristics, clinical presentations, imaging findings, delayed diagnosis (>4 h from first emergency department contact), and in-hospital mortality rates were analyzed. Results: The study included 103 patient charts, predominately men (71 patients), with a median age of 71 years (interquartile range of 58-78 years). Abdominal pain (36.9%) and thoracic pain (24.3%) were the most common presenting symptoms. Dyspnea (11.7%), altered consciousness (4.9%), and syncope (4.9%) were the three main painless presenting atypical symptoms. Atypical presentations were not significantly associated with delayed diagnosis, which occurred in 27.2% of cases. Normotension, a history of coronary artery disease, and pleural effusion were associated with delayed diagnosis. Abnormal chest films were major risk factors for in-hospital mortality, observed in 22.3% of patients with acute aortic dissection, whereas delayed diagnosis was not directly related to such mortality. Conclusion: The incidence of acute aortic dissection in the urban Thai population was 32.4 per 100,000 patient-years, with a range of clinical presentations. A high index of suspicion for AAD is crucial for timely diagnosis, even in patients with atypical symptoms and seemingly normal vital signs. Careful interpretation of chest radiographs is essential as abnormal chest X-ray findings are associated with a poorer prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.