Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40370670›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025

Kinematic effects of sensorimotor foot orthoses on the gait of patients with patellofemoral pain-a randomized controlled trial.

Steven Simon, Jonas Dully, Oliver Ludwig, Carlo Dindorf, Eva Bartaguiz, Michael Fröhlich, Stephan Becker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Steven SimonDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany.
Jonas DullyDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany.
Oliver LudwigDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany.
Carlo DindorfDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany.
Eva BartaguizDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany.
Michael FröhlichDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany.
Stephan BeckerDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Foot orthoses (FOs) are a noninvasive and cost-effective medical treatment that positively influence biomechanical factors, such as the kinematics of the lower extremities. Nevertheless, there is a research gap regarding the influence of FOs, particularly sensorimotor foot orthoses (SMFOs), on joint kinematics of the lower extremity in gait. Therefore, this randomized controlled clinical trial addressed the impact of SMFOs on the ankle, knee, and hip joint kinematics of patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP) in comparison to that of biomechanical foot orthoses (BMFOs). Methods: A total of 20 participants (6 men; 14 women) were part of a three-month intervention with stratified random assignment to custom-made SMFO or BMFO treatment. In the pre- and post-tests, three 12-meter gait walks were assessed by inertial measurement units (IMUs) with the patients wearing no FOs, SMFOs, and BMFOs. For each joint in all three dimensions, three-way repeated-measures statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA)-like statistics. Results: Results show that SMFOs and BMFOs both significantly changed ankle and knee kinematic parameters in patients with PFP in long-term. No significant immediate effects of FOs were detected; however, there were significant interaction effects between the time of measurement and the groups. In the pre-post comparison, the SMFO-treated group showed less dorsiflexion in the initial contact and terminal stance, less knee flexion in the mid stance, terminal stance, and pre-swing, as well as a more neutral knee movement in the frontal plane. The BMFO-treated group showed slightly more knee abduction in the terminal stance, greater knee flexion at initial contact, and less hip adduction at initial contact. Conclusions: Overall, the results of this trial support the assumption that temporal adaptation processes play a vital role in the application of custom-made orthopedic FOs and highlight the long-term effects on the kinematics of the lower extremities.

Indexed as

chondropathia patellaegait analysisinertial measurement unitsinsolessensorimotor system

Identifiers

PMID40370670
PMCPMC12075392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.