Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40370667›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Planarian RNAi knockdown: feeding once might just be enough.

Guillaume Reho, Yannick Menger, Vincent Lelièvre, Hervé Cadiou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guillaume RehoUPR 3212, Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Yannick MengerUPR 3212, Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Vincent LelièvreUMR 7364, Laboratoire des Neurosciences Cognitives et Adaptatives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Hervé CadiouUPR 3212, Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA interference (RNAi) is a powerful tool to knock down the expression of genes of interests. In planarians, a popular animal model to study development and regeneration processes, RNAi is easily set up by feeding the animals double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). However, there is no consensus in the literature on the amount of dsRNA needed to efficiently knock down gene expression, nor on the lasting effect of this knockdown. Here, we exposed the worms to two RNAi protocols, either feeding them dsRNA only once or three times in the span of a week. To observe the gradual loss and retrieval of nociceptive phenotypes, we exposed the worms to Allyl Isothiocyanate (AITC), an irritant and TRPA1 receptor agonist, while we knocked down the expression of the TRPA1 receptor and performed behavioral assessments over 11 weeks. We showed that feeding planarians once was sufficient to induce similar phenotypes as feeding them three times, that also lasted as long. These insights are useful to refine RNAi protocol timelines and may save some valuable resources.

Indexed as

knockdown (KD)nociceptionplanariarefinementRNA interferenceTRPA1

Identifiers

PMID40370667
PMCPMC12075233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.