Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40370662›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Maturation of infant sleep during the first 6 months of life: a mini-scoping review.

Abriana Gilchrist, Brandon S Aylward, Christopher M Laine, Harvey Karp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abriana GilchristT.H. Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Brandon S AylwardHappiest Baby Inc., Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Christopher M LaineT.H. Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Harvey KarpHappiest Baby Inc., Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Several foundational aspects of neurodevelopment occur during the early months of infant life, most notably the maturation and consolidation of wake/sleep cycles. Past studies have had difficulty quantifying infant sleep, with most researchers relying on low-resolution caregiver surveys. Data obtained from nightly measurements have not yet been aggregated across studies to clarify developmental trajectories and population norms. This mini-scoping review assesses data collected from actigraphy and sleep diaries; the two most common nightly infant sleep measurement techniques. Methods: The PubMed database was used to identify studies from 2000 to 2024 utilizing actigraphy and/or sleep diaries, and which report total night sleep (TNS), longest sleep stretch (LSS), and/or frequency of night wakings (NW) during the first 6 months of life. Data was then compiled per metric to reveal the extent of inter-and intra-study variability, and curves were fit to highlight developmental trajectories. Results: A total of 35 articles met inclusion criteria (16 studies using actigraphy only, 8 studies using sleep diary only, and 11 studies using both actigraphy and sleep diaries). The sample sizes of these studies ranged from 13 to 320 infants. The majority of studies ( Conclusion: Aggregation and regression revealed longitudinal trends, but highlighted variability within and between studies, as well as systematic differences between measurement methods. In order to establish reliable benchmarks, future studies must include well defined, objective measures of sleep as well as greater methodological consistency, larger cohorts, more frequent sampling, and clear disclosure of methodological limitations.

Indexed as

actigraphyinfant sleeplongest sleep stretchsleepsleep diarysleep monitoringtotal night awakeningstotal night sleep

Identifiers

PMID40370662
PMCPMC12075199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.