ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Maturation of infant sleep during the first 6 months of life: a mini-scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Infant Sleep Monitoring Using a Sensor-Enabled Responsive Bassinet: A Population-Scale Feasibility Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Several foundational aspects of neurodevelopment occur during the early months of infant life, most notably the maturation and consolidation of wake/sleep cycles. Past studies have had difficulty quantifying infant sleep, with most researchers relying on low-resolution caregiver surveys. Data obtained from nightly measurements have not yet been aggregated across studies to clarify developmental trajectories and population norms. This mini-scoping review assesses data collected from actigraphy and sleep diaries; the two most common nightly infant sleep measurement techniques. Methods: The PubMed database was used to identify studies from 2000 to 2024 utilizing actigraphy and/or sleep diaries, and which report total night sleep (TNS), longest sleep stretch (LSS), and/or frequency of night wakings (NW) during the first 6 months of life. Data was then compiled per metric to reveal the extent of inter-and intra-study variability, and curves were fit to highlight developmental trajectories. Results: A total of 35 articles met inclusion criteria (16 studies using actigraphy only, 8 studies using sleep diary only, and 11 studies using both actigraphy and sleep diaries). The sample sizes of these studies ranged from 13 to 320 infants. The majority of studies ( Conclusion: Aggregation and regression revealed longitudinal trends, but highlighted variability within and between studies, as well as systematic differences between measurement methods. In order to establish reliable benchmarks, future studies must include well defined, objective measures of sleep as well as greater methodological consistency, larger cohorts, more frequent sampling, and clear disclosure of methodological limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.