Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40370639›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2025

Decoding ARF4 and EIF5B-Based Prognostic Signatures and Immune Landscape Following Insufficient Radiofrequency Ablation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Through Multi-Omics and Experimental Validation.

Yixin Zhang, Yongpan Lu, Sui Zheng, Wanrong Luo, Min Tan, Baoming Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yixin Zhang *Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0001-5842-5058
Yongpan Lu *Department of Anorectal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266000, People's Republic of China.
Sui Zheng *Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, People's Republic of China.
Wanrong LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, People's Republic of China.
Min TanDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0007-1621-2656
Baoming LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is pivotal in non-surgical hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatments but poses a high postoperative recurrence risk, exceeding conventional surgeries. Insufficient tumor ablation may trigger immune responses, promoting tumor progression locally. Hence, this study seeks to pinpoint immune biomarkers to improve treatment precision and prognostic accuracy for RFA patients. Methods: The study utilized data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), and The International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) database to investigate novel immune biomarkers influencing the prognosis of patients undergoing insufficient radiofrequency ablation (IRFA). Subsequently, an IRFA model was developed and validated. Then, we employed Quantitative real time-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR), Western blotting (WB), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and immunofluorescence (IF) techniques on human HCC cell lines and IRFA animal model to validate ADP-ribosylation factor 4 (ARF4) and Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5B (EIF5B) expression and prognostic relevance post-IRFA. In addition, knockdown of ARF4 and EIF5B was performed to evaluate cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Finally, transcriptome sequencing was subsequently performed to confirm and extend our findings. Results: ARF4 and EIF5B were identified as critical immune targets affecting IRFA patient prognosis, forming the basis of an IRFA risk model. High-risk scores in this model correlated with poorer prognoses and reduced responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across multiple cancer types. Experimental validations confirmed the protective role of ARF4 and EIF5B in IRFA outcomes, while knockdown experiments suggested their involvement in promoting cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and EMT in IRFA models, potentially through pathways like P53 and Transforming Growth Factor Beta(TGF-β) signaling pathway activation as indicated by transcriptome sequencing. Conclusion: ARF4 and EIF5B have demonstrated promising potential as biomarkers influencing patient prognosis following RFA in HCC. These findings suggest they could serve as viable therapeutic targets aimed at mitigating HCC recurrence post-RFA.

Indexed as

ARF4biomarkerEIF5BHCCinadequate radiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID40370639
PMCPMC12075487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.