Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40370615›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Where to refine spatial data to improve accuracy in crop disease modelling: an analytical approach with examples for cassava.

Yevhen F Suprunenko, Christopher A Gilligan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yevhen F SuprunenkoDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5927-7571
Christopher A GilliganDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiological modelling plays an important role in global food security by informing strategies for the control and management of invasion and spread of crop diseases. However, the underlying data on spatial locations of host crops that are susceptible to a pathogen are often incomplete and inaccurate, thus reducing the accuracy of model predictions. Obtaining and refining datasets that fully represent a host landscape across territories can be a major challenge when predicting disease outbreaks. Therefore, it would be an advantage to prioritize areas in which data refinement efforts should be directed to improve the accuracy of epidemic prediction. In this paper, we present an analytical method to identify areas where potential errors in mapped host data would have the largest impact on modelled pathogen invasion and short-term spread. The method is based on an analytical approximation for the rate at which susceptible host crops become infected at the start of an epidemic. We show how implementing spatial prioritization for data refinement in a cassava-growing region in sub-Saharan Africa could be an effective means for improving accuracy when modelling the dispersal and spread of the crop pathogen cassava brown streak virus.

Indexed as

analytical approximationcrop landscapeepidemic invasionepidemiological modelinfection ratespatially explicit individual-based model

Identifiers

PMID40370615
PMCPMC12074810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.