ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Revisiting time-dependent growth and nucleation rates in the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov equation.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ligand-Mediated Defects Unlock Fast and Regenerable COJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Impact of Degradable Linkages on the Crystallization Behaviors of Polyethylene Mimics.Macromolecules · 2025Article
- Nucleation in Amorphous Terfenadine at a Temperature Much Lower than the Glass Transition Temperature and Its Impact on Physical Stability.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Revisiting time-dependent growth and nucleation rates in the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov equation.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov (JMAK) equation is widely used to model phase transformation kinetics-a topic central to materials in which solidification, precipitation or recrystallization is occurring. The classic derivation of this reaction equation primarily assumes that nucleation is either instantaneous or sporadic at a constant rate, and that growth rate is constant; consideration of possible time dependence of these rates is limited to the physically uncommon cases of the time dependence being linear. In contrast, many common phase transformations involve kinetics in which the growth rate varies in proportion to time raised to a power that can range from -0.5 (diffusion control; Fickian diffusion; case I diffusion), through values that represent anomalous diffusion, to zero (interface control; case II diffusion) and beyond (super case II diffusion). We have extended the classic derivation by generalizing the formulation of the growth and nucleation rates to include these contexts, and we introduce and justify some additional refinements while retaining the overall mathematical accessibility of the classic derivation. The reaction equations derived in this process explicitly demonstrate how the time dependence of nucleation rate and growth rate affects the constants in the JMAK equation, allowing the possibility of values beyond their classical range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.