Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40370594›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Beyond clinical scales: an observational study on instrumental gait analysis and biomechanical patterns in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Paolo De Pasquale, Mirjam Bonanno, Cristiano De Marchis, Luca Pergolizzi, Antonino Lombardo Facciale, Giuseppe Paladina, Maria Grazia Maggio, Federica Impellizzeri, Irene Ciancarelli, Angelo Quartarone and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Paolo De Pasquale *IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Mirjam Bonanno *IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Cristiano De MarchisDepartment of Engineering, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Luca PergolizziIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Antonino Lombardo FaccialeIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Giuseppe PaladinaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Maria Grazia MaggioIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Federica ImpellizzeriIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Irene CiancarelliDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Angelo QuartaroneIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Rocco Salvatore CalabròIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD), a common neurodegenerative disorder affecting motor functions, is associated with abnormal gait patterns characterized by altered kinematic, kinetic, and electrophysiological parameters. This observational study aims to instrumentally identify and quantify these gait dysfunctions in PD patients compared to normal values from healthy subjects. Methods: Sixty-nine PD patients underwent clinical and instrumental evaluations to assess gait. Demographic and clinical data were collected before motor assessment. Clinical scales evaluated the level of impairment, gait, balance, risk of falls and ability to complete activities of daily living. Instrumental evaluations were conducted using optoelectronic, force plates and electromyographic (EMG) systems in a motion analysis laboratory. Statistical analysis involved a non-parametric test to compare pathological and normal data, clustering methods to identify groups based on clinical evaluations, and a combination of non-parametric analysis and linear models to assess dependencies on clinical scales. Results: The results showed that PD patients had significant gait kinematic differences compared to normal values, with increased temporal and shortened spatial parameters. In addition, PD patients were grouped into four clusters based on clinical scales. While some gait features were influenced by clinical scales reflecting impairment, gait and balance, and independence, others were more affected by the perceived fear of falling (FoF). Discussion: In conclusion, the study identified specific biomechanical gait dysfunctions in kinematic, kinetic, and electrophysiological parameters in PD patients, undetectable by standard clinical scales. Additionally, higher FoF was associated with dysfunctional biomechanical patterns, independent of impairment severity, gait and balance dysfunction, or overall independence.

Indexed as

biomechanics of gaitfear of fallinggait analysisneurorehabilitationneurorehabilitation gait analysisoptoelectronic motion capture systemParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID40370594
PMCPMC12075126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.