Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40370584›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Michelle E Roh, Julie R Gutman, Maxwell Murphy, Jenny Hill, Mywayiwawo Madanitsa, Abel Kakuru, Hellen C Barsosio, Simon Kariuki, John P A Lusingu, Frank Mosha and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. RecurrentmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Michelle E RohInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Julie R GutmanMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA.
Maxwell MurphyDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jenny HillDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Mywayiwawo MadanitsaSchool of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Abel KakuruInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Hellen C BarsosioDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Simon KariukiKenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
John P A LusinguNational Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), Tanga Medical Research Centre, Tanga, Tanzania.
Frank MoshaKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Richard KajubiInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Moses R KamyaSchool of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Don MathangaMalaria Alert Center, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Jobiba ChinkhumbaDepartment of Health Systems and Policy, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Miriam K LauferCenter for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eulambius MluguDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Appolinary A R KamuhabwaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Eleni AklilluDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Omary MinziDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Roland Nnaemeka OkoroDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Ado Danazumi GeidamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri, Nigeria.
John David OhiekuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Meghna DesaiMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA.
Prasanna JagannathanDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Grant DorseyDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Feiko O Ter KuileDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

Examining the mechanisms and optimization of malaria chemoprevention strategies to improve birth outcomes in AfricaK99HD111572 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROH, MICHELLE · 2023 to 2024
$246k
NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD111572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High-grade Methods: We conducted two-stage, individual participant data meta-analyses of randomised trials comparing IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine on maternal, birth, and infant outcomes. We searched the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.Gov, PubMed, and the Malaria in Pregnancy Consortium Library, on July 30, 2020 (updated on September 24, 2024), without restrictions by publication date, peer-review status, or language. Eligible trials enrolled HIV-uninfected pregnant women, followed participants to delivery, included participants with no prior IPTp use during the current pregnancy, and were conducted in areas with high-level parasite resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (i.e., PfDHPS 540E ≥ 90% and/or 581G>0%). Only singleton pregnancies were analysed. The primary endpoint was a composite measure of any adverse pregnancy outcome defined as fetal or neonatal loss, small-for-gestational age, low birthweight, or preterm birth. Summary estimates were generated using a random-effects model. Gravidity subgroup analyses were performed. Causal mediation analyses were used to investigate the maternal mechanisms underlying the effect of IPTp regimens on birth outcomes. The meta-analysis is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020196127). Findings: Of 85 screened records, six trials (one multi-country trial) from Kenya, Malawi, Uganda and Tanzania contributed data on 6646 pregnancies. Compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, dihydroarteminsinin-piperaquine was associated with a 69% [95% CI: 45%-82%] lower incidence of clinical malaria during pregnancy, a 62% [37%-77%] lower risk of placental parasitaemia, and a 17% [0%-31%] lower incidence of moderate maternal anaemia. In contrast, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was associated with higher mean maternal weight gain (34 g/week [17-51]). There were no statistically significant differences in the composite adverse pregnancy outcome (RR = 1.05 [0.92-1.19]; Interpretation: In areas with high Funding: This work was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Indexed as

Antimalarial resistanceDihydroartemisinin-piperaquineIntermittent preventive treatment in pregnancyNon-malarial effectsPlasmodium falciparumSulfadoxine-pyrimethamine

Identifiers

PMID40370584
PMCPMC12076784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.