Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40370487›Full record

ArticleResearch ethics2024

'

Sylvia Nabukenya, David Kyaddondo, Adelline Twimukye, Ian Guyton Munabi, Catriona Waitt, Erisa S Mwaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research ethics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. "ItResearch ethics · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sylvia NabukenyaMakerere University College of Health Sciences, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-5868-7376
David KyaddondoMakerere University College of Health Sciences, Uganda.
Adelline TwimukyeInfectious Diseases Institute, Uganda.
Ian Guyton MunabiMakerere University College of Health Sciences, Uganda.
Catriona WaittInfectious Diseases Institute, Uganda.
Erisa S MwakaMakerere University College of Health Sciences, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-1672-9608

Funding

Makerere University International Bioethics Research Training ProgramD43TW010892 · FIC · MAKERERE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SEWANKAMBO, NELSON K · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010892Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to explore stakeholders' perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIV. A qualitative approach to investigation involved five focus group discussions with 30 Community representatives, 12 key informant interviews with researchers, and 12 in-depth interviews with research ethics committee members. In total, 54 stakeholders who were involved in pharmacogenomics research and HIV treatment and care contributed to the data collection between September 2021 and February 2022. The study explored five prominent themes: (i) defining the nature of research results to return to participants; (ii) preparing research participants to receive their results; (iii) obtaining informed consent for the return of results; (iv) opinions on health personnel to return the results to participants; and (v) opinions on how research results should be communicated to participants. Respondents identified various strategies for the return of individual results with minimal ethical risks including the setting up of a diverse and independent committee to undertake a risk-benefit assessment based on local context; ongoing discussions about the possible kinds of results and their implications throughout the study; and employing genetic counsellors to communicate results to participants. The strategies identified in this study should be further studied and independently verified.

Indexed as

Ethical considerationsHIV/AIDSperspectivespharmacogenomicsreturn of research resultsstakeholders

Identifiers

PMID40370487
PMCPMC12077594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.