ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Trends and hotspots on hymenoptera venom immunotherapy: a bibliometric and visualized analysis of research from 2014 to 2024.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning enables early risk stratification of hymenopteran stings: evidence from a tropical multicenter cohort.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Recently, the application of hymenoptera venom immunotherapy (VIT) has been extensively studied in the medical community. Nevertheless, there are still very few bibliometric analyses devoted to this field. Therefore, this study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the development of research in the past 11 years and clarify future research directions and trends. Methods: From 2014 to 2024, articles related to "hymenoptera venom immunotherapy "and "Allergy" were from the core collection of Web of Science. This visual analysis included examining annual productivity, cooperation between countries and institutions, co-cited references, author and journal cooperation networks, keyword co - occurrence, and their respective clustering and trends. Results: A total of 332 articles on the allergy caused by hymenoptera VIT were included in this study. Germany, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona and Golden, David B K are the most productive countries and institutions respectively. Analysis of the top 10 literatures with co-citation frequency found that 4 were expert consensus and guidelines, 4 were single-center (or multi-center), open, randomized controlled trials, and 2 were systematic reviews. Keyword cluster analysis showed that wasps were identified as the primary focus of hymenoptera VIT in the past, and mastocytosis and hymenopteran venom allergy were the current research hotspots. Conclusion: Recent studies on hymenoptera VIT have shown that today's VIT increasingly emphasizes individualized and refined treatment. However, there is a lack of evidence of multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in this field. Further investigation is warranted to bridge this research gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.