Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40370389›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Do teachers differ in terms of their empathy toward liked students and disliked students? The role of empathic motivation.

Xia Wang, Chenyu Shuangguan, Yuesheng Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xia WangSchool of Education, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Chenyu ShuangguanCollege of Education Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China.
Yuesheng HuangSchool of Education, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Teacher empathy has been proven to be highly relevant to both the educational process and outcomes. Therefore, exploring its influencing factors and developing effective cultivation strategies are highly importance. The present study aimed to examine the effects of teacher-perceived student likability on teacher empathy and to further explore the role of empathy motivations. Methods: In Study 1, 138 primary and secondary school teachers (mean age = 38.0 ± 8.8 years) reported their anticipated emotional exhaustion, empathic motivation, and empathic reaction when they read a text that described a negative event involving either a disliked or liked student. In Study 2, another 221 primary and middle school teachers (mean age = 34.8 ± 10.1 years) took part in an intervention designed to activate empathic motivation. Results: The results of study 1 showed that teachers felt less empathy in the former context. In addition, anticipated emotional exhaustion and empathic motivation serially mediated the effect of teacher-perceived student likability on teacher empathy. The results of Study 2 showed that teachers' empathy toward disliked students improved and that the likable empathy bias was eliminated when empathic motivation was primed. Discussion: These findings suggest that empathic motivation plays a crucial role in likable empathy bias among teachers in that it not only functions as a key mechanism underlying this bias but also emerges as a potential pathway for mitigating such bias. Our research has important theoretical and practical significance.

Indexed as

anticipated emotional exhaustionempathic motivationmediating effectteacher empathyteacher-perceived student likability

Identifiers

PMID40370389
PMCPMC12075550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.