Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40370358›Full record

ArticleArchives of physiotherapy

Association of physiotherapy dose with motor recovery in early subacute phase after stroke: results from a multicenter Italian study.

Silvia Salvalaggio, Nicola Valè, Thomas Bowman, Davide Cattaneo, Cristina Allera Longo, Serena Bocini, Viviana Bonci, Michele Gennuso, Francesca Marazzini, Francesco Giuseppe Materazzi and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physiotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Silvia SalvalaggioLaboratory of Computational Neuroimaging, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8838-0399
Nicola ValèDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2364-5990
Thomas BowmanIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9268-3915
Davide CattaneoIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan - Italy.
Cristina Allera LongoDepartment of Rehabilitation, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milano - Italy.
Serena BociniDivision of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Fondazione Opera San Camillo, Presidio di Torino, Torino - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6516-1752
Viviana BonciDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Neurorehabilitation clinic, AOU delle Marche, Ancona - Italy.
Michele GennusoDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Neurorehabilitation clinic, AOU delle Marche, Ancona - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9180-3555
Francesca MarazziniAIAS di Milano Onlus, Milan - Italy.
Francesco Giuseppe MaterazziMontecatone Rehabilitation Institute, Imola (BO), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5884-2157
Elisa PelosinDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa - Italy.
Martina PutzoluDepartment of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), Section of Human Physiology, University of Genoa, Genoa - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8972-9188
Andrea TurollaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Bologna - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1609-8060
Susanna MezzarobbaDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa - Italy.
Fabiola Giovanna Mestanza MattosIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan - Italy.
Simone GambazzaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Laboratory of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Epidemiology "G.A. Maccacaro," Dipartimento di Eccellenza 2023-2027, University of Milan, Milan - Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6225-2989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The literature investigating the factors associated with functional recovery after stroke suggests that, in the early subacute phase, time is the factor that most significantly drives the recovery. However, it is unclear whether the dose of physiotherapy (PT) delivered is equally associated with recovery of motor function and independence. Methods: A multivariable modeling of data from a multicenter longitudinal prospective cohort study investigating the contents of neurological PT interventions in Italy was developed, with the aim to estimate the association between the dose of PT received in the early subacute phase after stroke and recovery of walking, motor function, and independence. Results: A total of 96 patients were included in the analyses. PT dose seems associated with recovery of manual dexterity, measured by the Box and Block test (BBT), but not with the level of independence nor walking function. The probability of achieving a score higher than 31 at the BBT is 46% (95%CI: 18-76) after 10 hours and 76% (95%CI: 42-93) after 20 hours of PT, respectively. Conclusions: In the early subacute phase after stroke, the higher the dose of PT provided, the better the probability of significant recovery of upper limb (UL) dexterity should be.

Indexed as

DoseExpected recoveryPhysiotherapyStroke

Identifiers

PMID40370358
PMCPMC12076077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.