ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2025
Video-assisted mitral valve reoperation through a right minithoracotomy: A single-center experience.
Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The study aim was to determine our results of minimally invasive technique without aortic cross clamping for mitral valve surgery after previous cardiac surgery. Material and Methods: We performed 24 consecutive mitral valve surgeries between January 2015 and December 2018 in patients with a history of previous cardiac surgery. The procedure was performed using video-assisted right minithoracotomy, femoro-femoral bypass, a temperature of 26 °C, and cardiopulmonary bypass without aortic cross-clamping. Results: Mitral valve replacement was performed in 12 (50%) of these patients, and mitral valve repair was performed in the same number (50%). The mean ejection fraction was 46.08±6.52% and the mean age was 61.52±11.48 years. Eighteen patients (75%) had previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and six patients (25%) had previous mitral valve surgery. In terms of postoperative complication frequencies that patients have experienced, one of the patients (4.1%) had postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. Two patients (8.3%) had renal failure; 2 patients (8.3%) had pneumonia, and stroke was seen in one patient (4.1%) postoperatively, whereas 2 patients (8.3%) had reoperation for bleeding. The mean postoperative packed red blood cell transfusion requirement at 48 hours was 1.00±1.10 units. The mean length of hospital stay was 10.54±4.37 days. Conclusion: Minimally invasive port access procedure via right thoracotomy may be a safe and effective option in selected patients who need mitral surgery and have a history of prior sternotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.