Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40370057›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025

Sentinel dosing: A proposed algorithm to guide decision making on which cohorts in early phase clinical pharmacology trials should use this approach.

Jules A A C Heuberger, Perry de Jongh, Ewoud-Jan van Hoogdalem, Wim Tamminga, Pieter de Graeff, Geert Jan Groeneveld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jules A A C HeubergerCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, CL, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7202-5088
Perry de JonghICON plc, Groningen, BM, The Netherlands.
Ewoud-Jan van HoogdalemICON plc, Groningen, BM, The Netherlands.
Wim TammingaCTC Netherlands, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pieter de GraeffStichting Beoordeling Ethiek Biomedisch Onderzoek, Assen, ET, The Netherlands.
Geert Jan GroeneveldCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, CL, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4655-6667

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this paper is to describe a proposal for an algorithm to guide decision making on which cohorts in early phase pharmacology trials should employ a sentinel approach, thereby standardising and harmonising practices, and improving decision making around sentinel dosing. Sentinel dosing is an approach described in EMA guidelines; however, the guidance does not provide detail on which cohorts or dose levels sentinel dosing applies.

methodsThis algorithm was designed using the expertise of senior scientific staff from the largest clinical research organisations in the Netherlands and after consultation with members of the ethics committee handling most early phase clinical drug trials in the Netherlands.

resultsThe algorithm describes a decision tree considering different aspects of the design of the trial, the IMP, and the prior knowledge of the IMP based on (pre)clinical data, to be used by investigators and regulators. Hereby the decision-making process on sentinel cohorts will be tailored to the specific IMP and information available. Starting in 2024, all three expert Phase 1 units that co-authored this paper are using the algorithm as guidance for decision-making on the implementation of sentinels in trials that are submitted to the EC Stichting BEBO.

conclusionThe algorithm provides further guidance and specification on when to implement sentinel dosing in early phase clinical trials, thereby creating a standardised and harmonised approach, which will improve the protection of subject safety and trial efficiency.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicDecision MakingResearch DesignDecision TreesDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansNetherlandsdrug developmentfirst‐in‐humanregulationsentinel dosingstudy design

Identifiers

PMID40370057
PMCPMC12381618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.