SynthesisThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2025
Individual patient data meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors submitted for regulatory approval in adult obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Synthesis in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Does early non-improvement predict treatment failure in pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder? A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis with individual participant data.Psychological medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Mechanisms of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Cortico-Striatal Circuitry, Glutamatergic Dysregulation, and Neuroplastic Constraints.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Case Report: A Multimodal Treatment Approach Combining Multi-Target rTMS with a Modified, Largely Self-Administered, Clinician-Supervised Exposure and Response Prevention Protocol Using a Verbal Termination Cue in Two Patients with Severe Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the preferred pharmacological treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, insufficient response is common and it remains unclear whether specific patient-level factors influence the likelihood of treatment response.
aimsTo determine the efficacy and acceptability of SSRIs in adult OCD, and to identify patient-level modifiers of efficacy.
methodsWe conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) of industry-sponsored short-term, randomised, placebo-controlled SSRI trials submitted for approval to the Dutch regulatory agency to obtain marketing approval for treating OCD in adults. We performed a two-stage meta-analysis, using crude data of available trials. The primary outcome was the difference in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) change between active treatment and placebo. Secondary outcomes were differences in response (defined as the odds ratio of ≥35% YBOCS point reduction) and acceptability (defined as the odds ratio for all-cause discontinuation). We examined the modifying effect of baseline characteristics: age, gender, illness severity, depressive symptoms, weight, illness duration and history of antidepressant use.
resultsAfter excluding three trials because of missing data, we analysed results from 11 trials (79% of all submitted trials,
conclusionsOur IPDMA showed that SSRIs are well accepted and superior to placebo for treating OCD. The effects are modest and independent of baseline patient characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.