Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369908›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Comparison of Large Language Model with Aphasia.

Takamitsu Watanabe, Katsuma Inoue, Yasuo Kuniyoshi, Kohei Nakajima, Kazuyuki Aihara

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of Large Language Model with Aphasia.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takamitsu WatanabeInternational Research Centre for Neurointelligence, The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-6873
Katsuma InoueGraduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
Yasuo KuniyoshiGraduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
Kohei NakajimaInternational Research Centre for Neurointelligence, The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Kazuyuki AiharaInternational Research Centre for Neurointelligence, The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Corporation JPJ012425Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19H03535Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21H05679Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23H04217Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP20H05921JST FOREST Program 24012854Moonshot Research and Development Program JPMJMS2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) respond fluently but often inaccurately, which resembles aphasia in humans. Does this behavioral similarity indicate any resemblance in internal information processing between LLMs and aphasic humans? Here, we address this question by comparing the network dynamics between LLMs-ALBERT, GPT-2, Llama-3.1 and one Japanese variant of Llama-and various aphasic brains. Using energy landscape analysis, we quantify how frequently the network activity pattern is likely to move from one state to another (transition frequency) and how long it tends to dwell in each state (dwelling time). First, by investigating the frequency spectrums of these two indices for brain dynamics, we find that the degrees of the polarization of the transition frequency and dwelling time enable accurate classification of receptive aphasia, expressive aphasia and controls: receptive aphasia shows the bimodal distributions for both indices, whereas expressive aphasia exhibits the most uniform distributions. In parallel, we identify highly polarized distributions in both transition frequency and dwelling time in the network dynamics in the four LLMs. These findings indicate the similarity in internal information processing between LLMs and receptive aphasia, and the current approach can provide a novel diagnosis and classification tool for LLMs and help their performance improve.

Indexed as

AphasiaBrainLanguageHumansLarge Language Modelsaphasiaenergy landscape analysislarge language model

Identifiers

PMID40369908
PMCPMC12165151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.