ArticlePlant communications2025
A map of integrated cis-regulatory elements enhances gene-regulatory analysis in maize.
Article in Plant communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome evolution through polyploidy: Enhancing plant stress resilience in agriculture.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Review
- PCdb: A comprehensive plant genome-editing database integrating sgRNA efficiency, off-target predictions, and epigenomic landscapes.Plant communications · 2026Article
- Study on the positive regulation of drought tolerance by PdMYB2R032 based on R2R3-MYB gene family analysis in Populus deltoides.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Why "Where" Matters as Much as "How Much": Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- LcTprxII Overexpression Enhances Physiological and Biochemical Effects in Maize Under Alkaline (NaPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- BADDADAN: Mechanistic modelling of time-series gene module expression.Quantitative plant biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
cis-regulatory elements (CREs) are non-coding DNA sequences that modulate gene expression. Their identification is essential to the study of transcriptional regulation of genes that control key traits involved in plant growth and development. CREs are also critical for the delineation of gene-regulatory networks (GRNs), which map regulatory interactions between transcription factors (TFs) and target genes. In maize, CREs have been profiled using various computational and experimental methods, but the extent to which these approaches complement each other when identifying functional CREs remains unclear. Here, we report the data-driven integration of multiple maize CRE-profiling methods to optimize the capture of experimentally confirmed TF-binding sites, resulting in a map of integrated CREs (iCREs) with improved completeness and precision. We combined these iCREs with diverse gene expression datasets generated under drought conditions to perform motif enrichment analyses and infer drought-specific GRNs. Mining these organ-specific GRNs identified both known and novel candidate regulators of maize drought responses and revealed significant overlap with drought-associated eQTL regulatory interactions. Furthermore, analysis of transposable elements (TEs) overlapping with iCREs identified several TE superfamilies with epigenetic features characteristic of regulatory DNA that potentially mediate specific TF-target gene interactions. Overall, our study showcases the utility of multi-omics data integration to generate a high-quality collection of CREs and illustrates their potential to improve the characterization of gene regulation in the complex maize genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.