Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369834›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2025

Exploring the Meaning of Collaboration in Rural Mental Healthcare Delivery From the Perspective of Mental Health Clinicians and Informal Carers of People Living With a Mental Health Illness-A Qualitative Study.

Omolewa 'Lola Erinle, Michael Olasoji, David Schmidt, Tracy Burrows, Kirsti Haracz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Omolewa 'Lola ErinleCollege of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0041-4522
Michael OlasojiInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University, Berwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-6580
David SchmidtRural Research Capacity Building, Health Education Training Institute (HETI), Gladesville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1515-2990
Tracy BurrowsCollege of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-7864
Kirsti HaraczCollege of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1321-8899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health policies and practice guidelines emphasise the importance of collaboration with informal carers of people with mental illness, but this does not routinely occur in practice. Understanding the perspective of different parties regarding collaboration is a step towards ensuring an alignment between policy and routine clinical practice. This study explored the meaning of collaboration from the perspectives of informal carers and mental health clinicians in a rural Australian mental health service. This qualitative descriptive study used purposive sampling to recruit informal carers (n = 7) and mental health clinicians (n = 14) from an acute mental health inpatient facility. Data was generated from focus groups and semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. Three overarching themes were identified: three-way partnership, purposeful exchange and communication is everything. Clinician and informal carer participants described collaboration as a respectful partnership that necessarily involves the consumer, their carers and clinicians. The purpose of the partnership was identified as providing holistic care to the consumer, which essentially includes support for their carer. Open and clear communication, as well as information sharing, were identified as important to collaboration. However, the experiences of informal carers did not reflect this description of collaboration. Adequate support for informal carers, recognition of their expertise and open and consistent communication are key to a collaborative process that delivers better outcomes for consumers and their carers. Proactive clinician training and a practical guide to inform the delivery of routine informal carer engagement in mental health services are required to achieve an effective three-way collaboration.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCaregiversCooperative BehaviorMental DisordersMental Health ServicesRural Health ServicesAdultAustraliaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchcaregivershealth personnelinpatientsmental health servicesshared decision‐making

Identifiers

PMID40369834
PMCPMC12078865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.