ArticleJournal of oral rehabilitation2025
Haematologic Data Improves Long-Term Prediction Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Models for Temporomandibular Disorders.
Article in Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Approach for Determining the Risk of Temporomandibular Disorders.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Muscle-Nerve Signaling and Neurogenic Inflammation in Temporomandibular Disorders: Potential Contributions of Occlusal Interference and Other Peripheral Triggers.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to develop and evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict long-term treatment outcomes in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients using clinical data and verify the value of adding haematologic data in enhancing predictive accuracy.
methodsThe medical records of 132 TMD patients who visited the clinic and underwent 6 months of non-invasive conservative treatment between 2013 and 2019 were included in this study. The clinical data and haematologic features were collected from medical records. A decision tree algorithm was employed for feature selection, followed by a deep neural network (DNN) to build the prediction model. The performance of the models based on the decision tree algorithm and DNN was evaluated.
resultsThe decision tree model achieved an accuracy of 90.6% and an F1-score of 0.800. The subjective pain-related features, along with haematologic markers associated with systemic inflammation, were proven to be important features in the decision tree model. The predictive performance of the DNN model improved as haematologic features were added, with the final model achieving an accuracy of 90.6% and an F1-score of 0.769.
conclusionsThis study showed the potential of machine learning models in predicting long-term TMD prognosis using clinical and haematological features. In addition, these findings highlight the importance of including both subjective pain assessments and systemic haematologic markers for the development of aetiology-based diagnostic systems for TMD to enhance clinical decision-making and prognosis prediction accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.