ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2025
An interpretative phenomenological analysis of lived experiences and psychological processes in internalized weight stigma.
Article in British journal of health psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the Relationship Between Weight Discrimination and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Diabetes: Findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA).International journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- An interpretative phenomenological analysis of lived experiences and psychological processes in internalized weight stigma.British journal of health psychology · 2025Article
- The hidden pathways to internalized weight bias: from insecure attachment to depressive self-schemas.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveInternalized weight stigma (IWS) refers to the internalization of societal weight-based prejudices. While research on external weight stigma is well-established, the psychological mechanisms underlying IWS remain underexplored. This study aims to provide a deeper understanding of IWS by examining the lived experiences of individuals with obesity and identifying key psychological processes contributing to IWS.
designA qualitative design was employed, using both in-depth interviews and photo-elicitation to explore the lived experiences of nine participants.
methodsParticipants were invited to take pictures of situations which made them feel stigmatized about their body size during a 2-week-long photography task. Subsequently, participants reflected on the implications of their photographs during a 60-minute research interview. IPA was used to guide the analysis of the interview data.
resultsFour key psychological processes contributing to IWS were identified: (1) Self-application of negative stereotypes, where participants internalized societal stigma, sometimes resisting it but still experiencing self-critical thoughts; (2) Imposition of an undesired identity, where societal labels restricted self-expression, leading participants to adopt socially acceptable personas; (3) Heightened anxiety and social vigilance, where participants experienced anxiety, hyper-awareness, and discomfort in public settings; and (4) Distress and coping, where emotional distress and coping strategies like social withdrawal appeared to reinforce IWS.
conclusionsThese findings extended existing literature by providing a data-driven conceptualization of IWS. The findings underscore the importance of developing psychological interventions that address both IWS and external societal weight stigma, focusing on strategies that challenge self-critical narratives and promote more adaptive self-concepts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.