Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369769›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2025

Traumatic brain injury graphing: A case study of Charles Whitman.

K A Strube

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

K A StrubeIndependent Researcher, Bay City, Michigan, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research has identified violent behavior (i.e., assault, murder, and suicide) as a possible sequela of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and repeated mild TBI (rmTBI). However, misconceptions about consciousness and its ability to control an injured brain, the diverse spectrum of potential outcomes, and the role genetics/environmental factors can play make proving TBI's influence on inciting violent behavior by a perpetrator extremely difficult. Though the cause and execution may be complex, multifaceted, and vary in each individual, violent behavior is often preceded and accompanied by other emotional, behavioral, cognitive, and/or physical consequences. This research examines the benefits of graphing, using data interpreted from in-depth, color-coded reverse chronology, as a visualization tool for analyzing/displaying the potential impacts of TBI injuries and aggravators on violent outcomes, especially in complex situations. The case of Charles J. Whitman (herein referred to as CW) was used to demonstrate this method. Results revealed that sequelae clusters appeared shortly after suspected TBI injuries, sequelae changed and progressed over time, and numerous TBI aggravators were present at the time of the tragedy, including: an extended period of excessively high ambient temperatures, sleep deprivation (SD), drug use, blood loss, and emotional stressors. TBI graphing (utilizing reverse chronology) served as a valuable tool for observing the potential TBI sequelae progression prior to the violent event.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticViolenceAdultHumansMaleSleep DeprivationStress, PsychologicalSubstance-Related Disordersmass murdermatricidemoderate TBIrmTBIsuicideTBI aggravatorTBI graphingUT shooteruxoricideWhitman

Identifiers

PMID40369769
PMCPMC12223350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.