Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369755›Full record

ArticleAnimal bioscience2025

New prediction models for gross energy of pig urine using urinary nitrogen concentration and body weight: technical note.

Hyunseok Do, Bokyung Hong, Jeonghyeon Son, Noa Park, Beob Gyun Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hyunseok DoDepartment of Animal Science, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
Bokyung HongDepartment of Animal Science, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
Jeonghyeon SonDepartment of Animal Science, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
Noa ParkDepartment of Animal Science, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
Beob Gyun KimDepartment of Animal Science, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

Rural Development Administration PJ016911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives were to evaluate previous equations for estimating gross energy (GE) of pig urine using urinary nitrogen (N) and to develop novel equations for estimating GE concentrations of pig urine. A total of 136 urine samples were obtained from pigs fed 18 diets in 2 experiments. The samples were analyzed for GE and N concentrations. The accuracy of previous equations was assessed by regressing the measured values minus the predicted values for urinary GE concentration on the predicted values centered to the mean. Novel equations for estimating the urinary GE concentration were developed using urinary N concentration and body weight (BW) as independent variables. The previous equations overestimated (mean bias; p<0.001) urinary GE concentrations and the overestimation was more pronounced for the low-GE urine samples (linear bias; p<0.001). The novel equations developed in the present work were: urinary GE concentration (kcal/kg) = -7.51+12.83×urinary N (r2 = 0.92 and p<0.001) and -16.33+14.00×urinary N+0.192×BW-0.030×urinary N×BW (R2 = 0.92 and p<0.001) where N as g/kg and BW as kg. Overall, the previous equations overestimate urinary GE, particularly for low-GE urine of pigs. Gross energy concentrations in urine can be fairly accurately estimated using urinary N concentration and BW.

Indexed as

Body WeightGross EnergyModelsNitrogenSwineUrine

Identifiers

PMID40369755
PMCPMC12415472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.