ArticleAnnals of botany2025
Node of origin matters: comparative analysis of soil water limitation effects on nodal root anatomy in maize (Zea mays).
Article in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Broad environmental adaptation is associated with root anatomical phenotypes in maize landraces: an in silico study.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Integrating soil imaging with spatial omics to uncover root-soil interactions.Plant communications · 2026Review
- Breeding effects on the root-associated microbiome ofISME communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimRoot anatomy, determining the composition and organization of root tissues, has implications for water uptake and transport, and potential for enhancing crop resilience amid changing environmental conditions and erratic water supply. While our understanding of the functional relationship between root anatomical traits and soil resource acquisition continues to improve, anatomical traits are commonly investigated on adventitious roots emerging from a single node or averaged across nodes. We test the hypothesis that drought adaptations of anatomical and hydraulic phenes are specific to the nodal origin of the root.
methodsWe grew four maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes in the field under control and drought conditions, imposed by rainout shelters. Subsequently, we investigated the effect of soil drought on crown root anatomical phenes between consecutive shoot nodes. Based on these phenotypes, we inferred root cross-sectional hydraulic properties by integrating simulations of root anatomical networks via the GRANAR model and translating the outputs into hydraulic properties using the MECHA model.L. KEY
resultsAt the individual node level, drought-induced changes in root anatomical and hydraulic phenes were neither consistently significant nor unidirectional across nodes or genotypes. Notably, only second node crown roots consistently exhibited significant changes in response to drought. However, we observed distinct treatment differences in the development of phenes between consecutive shoot nodes. Most root anatomical and hydraulic phenes showed a (hyper)allometric relationship with increasing root cross-sectional area from older to younger roots. However, under drought, those allometric trajectories shifted. Specifically, root cross-sectional area and the areas of stele, cortex, metaxylem and aerenchyma, as well as cortical cell size and the axial hydraulic conductance increased more strongly from older to younger roots under drought. In contrast, metaxylem number increased more strongly under controlled conditions.
conclusionOur findings suggest that examining the drought response of root anatomical phenes at a single node may not provide a comprehensive understanding of root system responses to the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.