Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369701›Full record

ArticleStudies in family planning2025

"I Was Confident From the Bottom of My Heart That I Will be Fine With These Medicines": Qualitative Analysis of Decision-Making Around Self-Managed Abortion Trajectories in India.

Caila Brander, Caitlin McKenna, Caitlin Gerdts, Balasubramanian Palanisamy, Anoop Jain, Laura Jacobson, Katherine Key, Sruthi Chandrasekaran, Ruvani Jayaweera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in family planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caitlin McKenna
Balasubramanian Palanisamy
Anoop Jain
Sruthi Chandrasekaran

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the incidence of self-managed abortion (SMA) in India is well-documented, why the majority of abortions in India are self-managed remains largely unanswered. This qualitative study explores factors that contribute to decision-making about SMA in India. Between January and August 2022, we conducted 43 in-depth interviews with people who self-managed abortions across six Indian states, recruiting via accredited social health activists, clinic sampling frames, and social media posts. Underpinned by the Coast et al. framework, we coded and analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis and then organized factors that contributed to people's decision-making around SMA versus facility-based care. Contributing factors to people's decisions not to seek facility-based abortion care included concerns about poor treatment by providers, the unaffordability of private facility care, and fear of procedural abortion methods. Factors contributing to people's decision to seek SMA included having prior SMA experience, access to information about SMA, affordability, privacy, accessibility, and convenience. SMA is a valued option for abortion seekers in India due to perceived benefits and a desire to avoid facility-based care. Our findings highlight the need for improved person-centered abortion care at facilities and offer potential avenues for developing supportive resources for people who self-manage abortion in India.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedDecision MakingSelf-ManagementAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIndiaInterviews as TopicPregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40369701
PMCPMC12700130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.