ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025
Evaluating anti-MRSA antibiotic stewardship with a focus on trends in consumption and resistance in a tertiary hospital in Alexandria, Egypt from 2019 to 2023.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threatens infection treatment. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species (MRSS) are particularly challenging. This study examines the relative consumption of Linezolid (Reserve antibiotic) versus Vancomycin and Teicoplanin (Watch antibiotics) for MRSS, comparing trends with resistance patterns to optimize antibiotic use and combat AMR.
methodsThis observational retrospective study analyzed trends in the consumption of Vancomycin, Linezolid, and Teicoplanin among all patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Alexandria, Egypt from January 2019 to December 2023. The study compared these consumption patterns with resistance rates in Staphylococcus spp., including MRSS, from January 2020 to December 2023. Data on antibiotic consumption, expressed as defined daily doses per 1000 patient days (DDD/1000PD), were retrieved from pharmacy records, while resistance data were obtained from the WHONET database. Exploratory data analysis, including time series visualization and linear regression, assessed trends and the impact of COVID-19 on antibiotic use and resistance patterns.
resultsLinezolid consumption increased significantly (β = 3.72, 95% CI: 0.50 to 6.94, p = 0.027), while Teicoplanin consumption also rose but to a lesser extent (β = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.60, p < 0.001). Vancomycin consumption remained stable (β = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.77 to 0.15, p = 0.184). Overall, Linezolid experienced an increase in usage that was 2.5 times steeper compared to the combined use of Vancomycin and Teicoplanin. The ICU surveillance data indicated that the days of Vancomycin therapy per 1000 patient days decreased significantly (β = -5.02, 95% CI: -6.79 to -3.25, p < 0.001). Methicillin resistance remained high ranging from 47.8 to 85.2%. Throughout the study period, resistance to the three antibiotics was higher than resistance rates reported in other published studies across Egypt while remained stable and comparable between the hospital and ICU. In the hospital, resistance ranged from 4 to 23.7% for Vancomycin, 6.3-28.6% for Linezolid, and 0-41.7% for Teicoplanin. In the ICU, Vancomycin resistance ranged from 5.5 to 34.2%, Linezolid from 11.4 to 41.2%, and Teicoplanin from 7.1 to 38.8%.
conclusionsThis study underscores the urgent need for antimicrobial stewardship to reduce Linezolid overuse and address persistently high resistance rates against all anti-MRSA antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.