ArticleAnimal microbiome2025
Characterization of bacterial communities of ewe's vaginal tract and its potential impact on reproductive efficiency.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential metabolomic effects of progestagen-based estrus synchronisation in South African Dohne Merino ewes.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- Shifts in the vaginal microbiota of nulliparous ewe lambs following initial reproductive handling and estrus synchronization.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Towards cervical AI of sheep with stored semen: latest insights and future developments.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Impact of whole-herd vaccination on a caprine coxiellosis outbreak: a longitudinal study ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- The influence of vaginal microbiota on ewe fertility: a metagenomic and functional genomic approach.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Analysis of the sheep (Ovis aries) vaginal microbiota preceding spontaneous abortion: a pilot study.Access microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The success rate of artificial insemination in sheep remains suboptimal, which has led to an emerging interest in the impact of the reproductive tract microbiome on this process. This research aims to identify the ewes' vaginal core bacterial community, examine the factors influencing bacterial composition, and to determine the association between vaginal bacteria and pregnancy success. By using a robust dataset comprising 331 multiparous ewes from three Spanish breeds (Latxa, Manchega, Rasa Aragonesa) across four herds, this study performed the sequencing of the hypervariable regions V3-V4 of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene and the identification of Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASV) to analyze the bacterial community. Our analysis revealed a core bacterial primarily consisting of the genera Streptobacillus, Histophilus, Fusobacterium, Oceanivirga, and Parvimonas. Alpha and beta diversity, as well as Random Forest analysis, identified that herd and breed were the main drivers of bacterial variability. PERMANOVA analysis also showed significant differences in bacterial composition and abundance associated with pregnancy outcomes. Notably, specific ASVs associated with Fusobacterium, Leptotrichia, Histophilus, Escherichia, and Bacteroides were predominantly found in non-pregnant ewes, while genera such as Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and Brevundimonas were more abundant in pregnant ewes. This study contributes to the knowledge about the critical roles of specific bacteria in determining reproductive success in sheep and provides novel insights about the importance of different factors involved in the composition of ewes' vaginal bacterial communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.