Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369688›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2025

Characterization of bacterial communities of ewe's vaginal tract and its potential impact on reproductive efficiency.

E L Reinoso-Peláez, F Puente-Sánchez, M Serrano, J H Calvo, M Ramón, M Saura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E L Reinoso-PeláezInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Ctra. de La Coruña, km 7.5, 28040, Madrid, Spain. edgar.reinoso@inia.csic.es.
F Puente-SánchezDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
M SerranoInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Ctra. de La Coruña, km 7.5, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
J H CalvoARAID-Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA)-IA2, Av. de Montañana, 930, 50059, Zaragoza, Spain.
M RamónInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Ctra. de La Coruña, km 7.5, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
M SauraInstituto de Investigaciones Marinas (IIM-CSIC), Rúa Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208, Vigo, Spain.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PRE2019-090087Swedish Research Council, Sweden 2022-04801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success rate of artificial insemination in sheep remains suboptimal, which has led to an emerging interest in the impact of the reproductive tract microbiome on this process. This research aims to identify the ewes' vaginal core bacterial community, examine the factors influencing bacterial composition, and to determine the association between vaginal bacteria and pregnancy success. By using a robust dataset comprising 331 multiparous ewes from three Spanish breeds (Latxa, Manchega, Rasa Aragonesa) across four herds, this study performed the sequencing of the hypervariable regions V3-V4 of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene and the identification of Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASV) to analyze the bacterial community. Our analysis revealed a core bacterial primarily consisting of the genera Streptobacillus, Histophilus, Fusobacterium, Oceanivirga, and Parvimonas. Alpha and beta diversity, as well as Random Forest analysis, identified that herd and breed were the main drivers of bacterial variability. PERMANOVA analysis also showed significant differences in bacterial composition and abundance associated with pregnancy outcomes. Notably, specific ASVs associated with Fusobacterium, Leptotrichia, Histophilus, Escherichia, and Bacteroides were predominantly found in non-pregnant ewes, while genera such as Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and Brevundimonas were more abundant in pregnant ewes. This study contributes to the knowledge about the critical roles of specific bacteria in determining reproductive success in sheep and provides novel insights about the importance of different factors involved in the composition of ewes' vaginal bacterial communities.

Indexed as

Artificial inseminationBacterial communitiesFertilityOvineReproductive successVaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID40369688
PMCPMC12079919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.