ArticleArthritis research & therapy2025
Gender differences in clinical and prescribing characteristics of biologic and targeted synthetic drugs in naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Data from BIOBADASER III registry.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex and gender differences in rheumatology: clinical impact and future directions.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- SARC-F as a Screening Tool in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Real-World Burden of Sarcopenia Risk, Sex Differences, and Clinical Correlates.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Post-marketing surveillance of upadacitinib: multilevel analysis of venous thromboembolism reporting in global data and rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic inflammatory autoimmune disease that can lead to progressive joint damage and irreversible disability when inadequately treated. RA is more common in women than in men. Disease characteristics differ between genders in terms of comorbidities, extra-articular manifestations, quality of life, disease activity and functional scores. There is a possibility that RA may be managed differently depending on gender: under-treated due to professional bias when prescribing advanced therapies, or over-treated due to overestimation of disease activity. Our primary objective was therefore to examine gender differences in the time course from RA diagnosis to initiation of the first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) or targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD) and to identify factors associated with earlier or later prescribing. We also aimed to assess the differences between men and women in clinical characteristics and disease activity at initiation of the first b/tsDMARD among bio-naïve RA patients.
methodsWe analyzed RA patients from the BIOBADASER III registry who began their first b/tsDMARD between 2000 and 2023, stratified by treatment start year. Clinical characteristics were compared by sex, using linear regression models for DAS28. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression identified factors influencing treatment initiation timelines.
resultsWe included 3,384 patients (78.1% women). Males presented higher cardiovascular risk, females more osteoporosis and Sjögren Syndrome. At treatment start, females had lower mean age (54.8 vs. 57 years, p < 0.001) but longer disease duration (7.3 vs. 6.7 years, p = 0.031); higher DAS28-ESR, but not DAS28-CRP; higher subjective components of DAS28 and ESR but lower CRP and no differences in objective components. Disease duration differed between sexes only in the most recent cohort (≥ 2017, HR 0.9 (95% CI 0.81; 0.99), p = 0.026): female sex, age, and treatment with csDMARDs (other than methotrexate) were associated with later prescribing, whereas tobacco, obesity and treatment with methotrexate or glucocorticoids with earlier.
conclusionsLater prescribing in women despite higher activity rates merits reflection. Discrepancies between subjective and objective measures of DAS, and ESR and CRP, may reflect the need to establish different cut-off points for men and women, and opens a field of research worth exploring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.