ArticleBMC chemistry2025
Deciphering the structural and dynamic effects of SHP2-E76 mutations: mechanistic insights into oncogenic activation.
Article in BMC chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The tyrosine phosphatase known as SHP2 is a cytoplasmic protein and encodes by proto-oncogene PTPN11. This protein is essential for the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, programed cell death, and survival. This regulation is achieved through the release of intramolecular autoinhibition and the modulation of several signaling pathways, including the signaling cascade of Ras-MAPK. Mutations in SHP2 are frequently associated with human malignancies and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Specifically, a germline mutation (E76D) in SHP2 is linked to neurodevelopmental disorders, such as Noonan syndrome, while somatic mutations (E76G and E76A) and altered SHP2 expression are implicated in several forms of leukemia. These mutations disrupt the closed conformation, which normally keeps SHP2 in an inactive, auto-inhibited state, thereby enhancing phosphatase activity and activating SHP2, leading to a gain-of-function effect. However, the structural and functional implications of these disease-related mutants are not well elucidated. Therefore, in this study, we investigate the structural mechanisms underlying three distinct gain-of-function SHP2 mutations (E76D, E76G, and E76A) through the application of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, focusing on how a single amino acid mutation at the same position result in different disease phenotypes, either cause cancer or NDDs. Notably, Patients with Noonan Syndrome have an increased risk of developing cancer, suggesting a potential link between these diseases and their mutations. MD simulation was employed to elucidate this mechanism, examining four distinct states: Apo-state (E76), M1-state (E76D), M2-state (E76G), and M3-state (E76A). The dynamics and conformational changes of SHP2 in both its Apo-state and mutant states (M1, M2, and M3) were compared. Our findings indicate that both cancer-related and NDD-related mutations destabilize the N-SH2 and PTP interface, facilitating SHP2 activation. However, the cancer-associated mutations induce more severe disruption at the N-SH2 and PTP interface than the NDD mutations. Additionally, dynamic analyses revealed that mutations at the interface (M1, M2, and M3) not only alter the native folded conformation of SHP2 but also significantly enhance the C-distance between the N-SH2 and PTP domains. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the structural dynamics of SHP2 at the atomic level, revealing how mutations disrupt its auto-inhibition and increase PTP activity, providing valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms driving both cancer and neurodevelopmental disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.