ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025
Fate-tox: fragment attention transformer for E(3)-equivariant multi-organ toxicity prediction.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- MacroTox: A Macroscopic Graph Topology-Based Multimodal Learning Framework for Robust Molecular Toxicity Prediction.JACS Au · 2026Article
- AI/ML-based computational models for toxicity prediction.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Review
- Review
- Advancing the Discovery of Emerging Contaminants: A Leap in Technology and Data.Environmental science & technology · 2026Review
- A Systematic Survey and Benchmark of Deep Learning for Molecular Property Prediction in the Foundation Model Era.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Review
- Predicting toxicity and bioactivity of the chemical exposome: a case study for the blood exposome database.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Predicting Toxicity and Bioactivity of the Chemical Exposome: A Case Study for the Blood Exposome Database.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Toxicity is a critical hurdle in drug development, often causing the late-stage failure of promising compounds. Existing computational prediction models often focus on single-organ toxicity. However, avoiding toxicity of an organ, such as reducing gastrointestinal side effects, may inadvertently lead to toxicity in another organ, as seen in the real case of rofecoxib, which was withdrawn due to increased cardiovascular risks. Thus, simultaneous prediction of multi-organ toxicity is a desirable but challenging task. The main challenges are (1) the variability of substructures that contribute to toxicity of different organs, (2) insufficient power of molecular representations in diverse perspectives, and (3) explainability of prediction results especially in terms of substructures or potential toxicophores. To address these challenges with multiple strategies, we developed FATE-Tox, a novel multi-view deep learning framework for multi-organ toxicity prediction. For variability of substructures, we used three fragmentation methods such as BRICS, Bemis-Murcko scaffolds, and RDKit Functional Groups to formulate fragment-level graphs so that diverse substructures can be used to identify toxicity for different organs. For insufficient power of molecular representations, we used molecular representations in both 2D and 3D perspectives. For explainability, our fragment attention transformer identifies potential 3D toxicophores using attention coefficients. Scientific contribution: Our framework achieved significant improvements in prediction performance, with up to 3.01% gains over prior baseline methods on toxicity benchmark datasets from MoleculeNet (BBBP, SIDER, ClinTox) and TDC (DILI, Skin Reaction, Carcinogens, and hERG), while the multi-task learning approach further enhanced performance by up to 1.44% compared to the single-task learning framework that had already surpassed these baselines. Additionally, attention visualization aligning with literature contributes to greater transparency in predictive modeling. Our approach has the potential to provide scientists and clinicians with a more interpretable and clinically meaningful tool to assess systemic toxicity, ultimately supporting safer and more informed drug development processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.