ArticleClinical epigenetics2025
Associations of epigenetic aging with self-rated health, access to care, and healthcare utilization in a representative sample of United States adults.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health insurance, healthcare access, and their roles in the association between blood lead levels and epigenetic aging in United States adults.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Translational Geroscience Strategies for Delaying Multimorbidity.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Review
- Association of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) with epigenetic age acceleration in adults: insights from NHANES.Epigenetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealth status is closely linked to both healthcare access and utilization. While previous research has identified associations between health status and DNA methylation-based biomarkers of aging (epigenetic aging), studies exploring these relationships in the context of healthcare access and utilization remain limited. To address this gap, we analyzed cross-sectional associations in a representative sample of 2,343 U.S. adults from the 1999-2000 and 2001-2002 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Our study examined the relationships of self-rated health status, healthcare access, and healthcare utilization with seven epigenetic aging biomarkers: HannumAge, HorvathAge, SkinBloodAge, PhenoAge, GrimAge2, DNAm Telomere Length (DNAmTL), and DunedinPoAm.
resultsAfter adjusting for chronological age, demographics, lifestyle factors, and health insurance, participants with good-excellent self-rated health had a 1.58-year lower PhenoAge (95% CI - 2.54, - 0.62 P = 0.006) and a 1.16-year lower GrimAge2 (95% CI - 1.80, - 0.53, P = 0.004) than participants with poor-fair health. Participants who reported having a routine place where they received healthcare had a lower GrimAge2 (β = - 1.44-years, 95% CI - 2.66, - 0.22, P = 0.03) than participants without a routine healthcare location. Participants with ≥ 10 healthcare visits in the prior year had a shorter DNAmTL (β = - 0.05-kb, 95% CI - 0.09, - 0.01, P = 0.02) than participants with < 10 visits. After including additional adjustments for estimated leukocyte proportions, participants who were hospitalized overnight in the prior year had a shorter DNAmTL (β = - 0.05-kb, 95% CI - 0.08, - 0.01, P = 0.02) than non-hospitalized individuals.
conclusionsOur findings reinforce previous reports linking better health status to lower epigenetic aging and provide new evidence of associations of epigenetic aging with measures of healthcare access and utilization. If validated, these findings suggest that epigenetic aging biomarkers may be useful in studying disease processes and assessing health outcomes related to access and utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.