Trial reportBMC medical education2025
Role play versus video-based learning for interprofessional communication and teamwork skills in nursing and medical students: a mixed-methods study in Pakistan.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intersection of medicine and nursing in endoscopic sedation: Understanding roles and responsibilities.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective interprofessional communication (IPC) is crucial for patient safety. However, IPC training is often insufficient in medical and nursing education in Pakistan. This study compares the effectiveness of Video-Based Learning (VBL) and Role Play (RP) in enhancing IPC and teamwork skills among undergraduate medical and nursing students.
methodsA mixed-method approach encompassed a quasi-experimental design with focused group discussions. 64 participants were randomly divided into two groups (n = 32 each), each receiving training through either VBL or RP. The study employed the Communication and Teamwork Skills (CATS) assessment instrument utilized by two independent raters to evaluate improvements in coordination, situational awareness, cooperation, and communication skills before and after the interventions. Additionally, focus group discussions provided qualitative insights regarding the teaching strategies.
resultsBoth RP and VBL significantly improved IPC and teamwork skills compared to baseline. RP showed greater enhancements across coordination, cooperation, and situational awareness compared to VBL. (p < 0.001). In the VBL group, significant improvements were observed in coordination (pre: 5.46 ± 1.93, post: 7.90 ± 2.50, p < 0.001), situational awareness (pre: 2.62 ± 1.07, post: 3.68 ± 1.78, p = 0.006), and communication (pre: 4.75 ± 3.57, post: 11.28 ± 3.72, p < 0.001), but not in cooperation (pre: 7.06 ± 3.24, post: 8.21 ± 2.57, p = 0.119). The RP group showed significant improvements in coordination (pre: 6.28 ± 2.58, post: 12.40 ± 2.62, p < 0.001), situational awareness (pre: 3.06 ± 2.21, post: 5.65 ± 1.51, p < 0.001), cooperation (pre: 8.09 ± 4.07, post: 13.46 ± 3.58, p < 0.001), and communication (pre: 4.25 ± 4.22, post: 13.15 ± 6.33, p < 0.001). Qualitatively, both methods were perceived as engaging and interactive, with the hands-on component in RP regarded by the participants as very valuable to actively practice their skills in a simulated environment.
conclusionsRP significantly outperforms VBL in enhancing IPC and teamwork skills, making it a superior tool for healthcare education. The findings suggest that RP's practical, interactive nature makes it a more effective tool for teaching IPC and teamwork in medical and nursing education. Integrating RP activities into the curriculum could enhance communication and teamwork skills among students. Evaluating the longitudinal impact of this integration on patient care could be an area for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.