Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369528›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Attitudes towards the dual health insurance system and inequalities in health care in Germany - results of a population survey.

Olaf von dem Knesebeck, Jens Klein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Economic burden ofFrontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olaf von dem KnesebeckInstitute for Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany. o.knesebeck@uke.de.
Jens KleinInstitute for Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Germany, type of health insurance is an important aspect of health care inequalities because there is a dual structure of statutory and private health insurance and there are incentives for a preferential treatment of privately insured patients. Two questions will be addressed in the study: What are the public attitudes towards the dual system of health insurance and inequalities in health care between those with statutory and private insurance? Are these attitudes associated with socio-demographic characteristics, health insurance and political party preferences?

methodsBased on a random sample, an online survey among the adult population (18 + years) in Germany was conducted (N = 2,201). Attitudes towards statutory and private health insurance were assessed using four items. Two items related to inequalities in access and quality of care; two were aimed at the system structure and remuneration. Age, gender, education, migration history, region of residence, health insurance and political party preference were included in the analyses as predictors.

resultsAbout 77% of respondents agreed with the statement that all insured persons in Germany have the same access to medically necessary care. Women were less convinced in this respect. Just over 20% agreed with the statement that people with statutory and private health insurance receive the same quality of medical care. Agreement was particularly high among men, older people and those with private insurance. Almost 80% were in favor of abolishing the coexistence of statutory and private health insurance. Agreement was lower among privately insured people and supporters of the liberal party; however, even in these subgroups, a majority of over 60% were in favor of abolition. Just over 15% found the different remuneration of services for those with statutory and private insurance acceptable. Agreement was significantly higher among older people and those with private insurance.

conclusionsA clear majority of the German population perceives inequalities in the quality of medical care between those with statutory or private health insurance and is in favor of abolishing the dual system of statutory and private health insurance. These majorities can be found in all socio-demographic subgroups and across all political party lines.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesInsurance, HealthPublic OpinionAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultAttitudesHealth care inequalitiesPopulation surveyPrivate health insuranceStatutory health insurance

Identifiers

PMID40369528
PMCPMC12080041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.