ArticleBMC nursing2025
Translation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Nurses' Work Value Scale: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNurses' work values constitute the core driving force of their professional careers. These values deeply reflect an individual's comprehensive understanding of the nursing profession, positive attitudes toward it, and aspirations for its goals. However, there is currently no specific scale available in China for assessing nurses' work values.
objectiveTo translate the Nurses' Work Values Scale (NWVS) and validate its reliability and validity among clinical nurses, providing a reliable tool for assessing nurses' work values in China.
designA quantitative and cross-sectional design.
methodsOn the basis of Brislin's translation model, the NWVS was translated, back-translated, synthesized, culturally adapted, and pilot tested to develop a Chinese version of the NWVS. Convenience sampling was used to select clinical nurses from three tertiary-level A hospitals in Jiangsu and Zhejiang from January to April 2024 to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the NWVS.
resultsThe Chinese version of the NWVS includes four factors with 30 items. The exploratory factor analysis extracted four common factors with eigenvalues > 1, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 68.762%. Validated factor analysis revealed good model fit, with χ
conclusionThe Chinese version of the Nurses' Work Values Scale has good reliability and validity in assessing the work values of Chinese nurses, making it a reliable tool. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.