ArticleBMC medical education2025
Psychiatrists' experiences of patient suicide loss: perspectives from residency and supervision.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient suicide is a common adverse event during psychiatric residency. This study aimed to understand psychiatry residents' experiences of patient suicide from the perspectives of psychiatrists who experienced this loss as a resident and/or as a psychiatrist supervising residents, and to assess which interventions may help residents feel supported after such tragedies.
methodsThis is a secondary qualitative analysis based on a previous study in which psychiatrists who experienced a patient's death by suicide were interviewed about their experiences. Of the 18 participants interviewed, 13 participants had experienced the death of a patient by suicide during residency and/or had experience supervising residents in the context of this loss. Direct transcriptions from these 13 interviews were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory.
resultsParticipants' experiences of patient suicide during training were influenced by the practice setting, patient-related factors, learners' personal circumstances, and the supervisor-trainee relationship. Participants described feeling supported by supervisors from a practical perspective, such as offering a modified workload. Emotional, professional, and existential supports were identified as helpful, though their provision varied depending on the supervisory dynamic. There were differences between resident and supervisor responses to patient suicide, which may be due to residents' fear of negative evaluations and lack of formal training for supervisors.
conclusionsThe experience of a patient's death by suicide during residency is diverse and multifactorial. Encouraging connection within the supervisory relationship is critical for both residents and supervisors in coping with the loss and effectively supporting trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.